09 Sep 2026

Many business owners want to transfer shares in their company to their spouse or children while continuing to receive income from those shares and remaining involved in important decisions.

This raises several practical questions: When should the transfer take place? How can the business owner retain sufficient income? How can the company’s continuity be protected? And how can the interests of the different beneficiaries be balanced?

Failing to plan ahead can create difficulties. After the business owner’s death, the shares may be divided among several heirs, resulting in fragmented ownership, joint ownership or disagreements that could disrupt the company.

On the other hand, gifting the shares in full ownership means that all the rights attached to them are transferred immediately. The donor may therefore lose the related income and decision-making rights sooner than intended.

A gift with split ownership provides an intermediate solution. It allows the business owner to transfer ownership gradually while retaining certain rights for a defined period. However, the arrangement must be carefully planned. Voting rights, entitlement to dividends, share valuation, tax consequences and fairness among the heirs should all be considered before the gift is made.

What does split ownership of company shares mean?

Full ownership of a share normally includes three main elements:

  • ownership of the share itself;
  • the right to receive dividends and other distributions; and
  • the right to participate in the company’s decisions.

Split ownership divides these rights between two persons: the usufruct holder and the bare owner.

The usufruct is the temporary right to benefit from the shares. The usufruct holder may, in particular, receive dividends and take part in certain company decisions, including decisions concerning the allocation of profits.

The bare owner owns the shares but does not immediately enjoy all the rights attached to them, as some of those rights are temporarily held by the usufruct holder.

In practice, a business owner may gift the bare ownership of the shares to a spouse or children while retaining the usufruct.

The beneficiaries immediately become the bare owners of the shares, while the donor may continue to receive the related income. When the usufruct ends, it automatically combines with the bare ownership, and the beneficiaries become the full owners of the shares.

However, split ownership does not automatically determine who is entitled to each type of distribution or who may vote on each type of decision. These matters must be organised in accordance with the company’s legal form, its articles of association and the deed of gift.

Why consider this type of gift?

A gift with split ownership may serve several business, family and estate-planning objectives.

Plan the transfer of the business in advance.
The business owner can choose the beneficiaries, decide how many shares each person will receive and organise the transfer during their lifetime rather than leaving these matters to the succession process.

Retain a source of income.
By keeping the usufruct, the donor may continue to receive dividends distributed by the company.

Prepare the company’s future governance.
The arrangement can define the respective roles of the donor and the beneficiaries in the company’s decision-making process.

Reduce the risk of family disputes.
A planned transfer can limit the risks associated with joint ownership, fragmentation of the company’s share capital and disagreements among heirs.

What should be considered before making the gift?

A gift with split ownership requires more than dividing ownership between the donor and the beneficiaries. The rights and obligations of each party must be clearly defined before the transaction is completed.

Who will receive the dividends and other distributions?
The treatment may vary depending on the type of distribution. The deed of gift and the company’s articles of association should therefore clearly address the respective rights of the usufruct holder and the bare owners.

Who will vote on company decisions?
Voting rights may vary depending on the company’s legal form and the nature of the decision. Retaining the usufruct does not necessarily allow the donor to retain all decision-making powers.

Are the deed of gift and the articles of association consistent?
The relevant documents must contain compatible rules. Any approval clause, pre-emption right or other restriction that may affect the transfer should also be identified in advance.

How should the shares be valued, and what are the tax consequences?
The value attributed to the usufruct and bare ownership must be properly supported. The applicable tax treatment should also be assessed in light of the company, the rights transferred and the personal circumstances of the parties.

How can fairness within the family be preserved?
Some beneficiaries may be actively involved in the company while others are not. The transfer should therefore take account of their different roles and interests to reduce the risk of future disputes.

Because these matters are closely connected, a standard solution may not achieve the business owner’s objectives. The arrangement should be designed around the company’s ownership structure, the donor’s financial needs, the company’s governance and the family’s circumstances.

A tailored approach is essential

There is no single split-ownership structure that is suitable for every business or every family.

Planning the transaction in advance makes it possible to confirm its feasibility, understand its legal and tax effects and make any necessary adjustments before the deed of gift is signed.

MKonsulting assists business owners and families in designing and securing gifts of company shares with split ownership. Our services include reviewing the parties’ circumstances, defining the appropriate transfer structure, assessing its legal and tax consequences, valuing the shares and ensuring consistency with the company’s articles of association.

22 Jan 2026

Family businesses play a central role in the economy and are characterized by the concentration of ownership and management in the hands of the founder or a key family member.

This structure promotes strategic consistency and swift decision-making, but it also exposes the company to vulnerabilities in the event of the manager’s departure, incapacity, or death.

Recent amendments to Law No. 5-96 on commercial companies, introduced by Laws No. 44.24 and No. 45.24, published in the Official Bulletin of the Kingdom of Morocco on August 22, 2024, reflect this reality. They provide practical solutions to situations that had long lacked clear legal regulation and that directly affect family businesses structured as SARLs.

In many family-owned SARLs, the manager is the founder or a central family member. When this manager leaves office unexpectedly, the company may find itself unable to make decisions. Before the reform, only the manager or the statutory auditor could convene a general meeting. However, family-owned SARLs often do not have a statutory auditor, which exposed them to situations of deadlock.

Law No. 44.24 addresses this issue by now allowing the partners to convene a general meeting whenever the position of manager becomes vacant, regardless of the reason. This change strengthens the company’s legal security and ensures continuity of management. It also provides family members who are partners with a legal framework to organize the transition without immediately resorting to the courts.

Another major contribution concerns the situation, which is very sensitive from an estate-planning perspective, of the death of the sole partner of a limited liability company.

This single-member corporate form is widely used, but before the reform it suffered from a significant weakness. In the absence of a specific legal provision, the heirs of the sole partner were faced with a frozen company, with no clear possibility to update the articles of association (Statuts) or to adapt the structure to the succession process.

Law No. 45.24 offers a pragmatic solution to this problem. It allows heirs or beneficiaries to request that the president of the commercial court appoint a representative responsible for convening the company’s general meeting.

This request must be made within sixty days of the death. The aim is not to resolve inheritance disputes, but to allow the company to continue operating normally and to bring its articles of association into line with the new shareholding situation.

For family businesses, this mechanism has clear asset-protection benefits. It prevents one heir from taking control of the company without a clear legal framework and safeguards the rights of all beneficiaries. It also helps preserve the economic value of the business during the estate settlement period.

These new provisions reflect a significant evolution in company law, enabling family-owned SARLs to navigate transition periods without jeopardizing business continuity.

However, these legislative developments do not replace the need for company leaders to plan ahead for succession using appropriate legal and financial tools. Our firm assists family businesses and their managers in structuring and implementing these mechanisms, ensuring secure governance, an orderly succession process, and effective protection of their professional assets.

22 Jan 2026

Often reduced to a mere accounting entry, the shareholder’s current account (SCA) is, in practice, one of the most powerful internal financing instruments available to companies. It enables shareholders (whether founders or investors) to inject liquidity rapidly into the business without resorting to traditional bank financing and its associated constraints in terms of guarantees, procedures, and timing.

However, despite its apparent flexibility and informality, the shareholder’s current account is governed by a strict legal, tax, and financial framework. Its security does not depend solely on the reality of cash flows, but also on strict compliance with formal requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements may expose both the company and the shareholder to significant legal and tax risks.

A High Value-Added Treasury Management Tool

Recourse to a shareholder’s current account primarily responds to an operational treasury need. Unlike bank loans, which are often subject to the constitution of real guarantees (mortgages, pledges) and lengthy approval processes, advances made through a shareholder’s current account allow the company to meet its liquidity needs immediately.

From a financial standpoint, the SCA offers a high degree of flexibility. It allows shareholders to temporarily place their personal funds at the disposal of the company without altering the share capital or resorting to external financing. The amounts advanced therefore constitute an immediate source of liquidity intended to cover the company’s ongoing operational requirements.

From a wealth management perspective, the shareholder’s current account operates as a tool for financial arbitrage. The shareholder retains ownership of the advanced funds, which remain repayable in principle, subject to the company’s financial situation. At the same time, these advances may generate financial charges for the company, which can be deducted from its taxable income, provided that the strict conditions set out by Moroccan tax law are fully respected.

The Tax Lock: Interests, Deductibility Conditions, and Recharacterization Risks

While the shareholder’s current account is a flexible financing mechanism, its tax treatment in Morocco is strictly regulated and requires heightened vigilance. The Moroccan Tax Code allows the deductibility of interest paid to shareholders only if several cumulative conditions are met.

In particular, for interest to be tax-deductible, the following conditions must be satisfied:

  • the share capital must be fully paid up;
  • the amount of remunerated advances must not exceed the amount of the share capital;
  • the deductible interest rate must not exceed the ceiling rate set annually by order of the Minister in charge of Finance.

Failure to meet any one of these conditions results in the reintegration of interest into the company’s taxable income, with the corresponding corporate tax consequences.

From the shareholder’s perspective, interest credited to the shareholder’s current account is subject to withholding tax. The applicable rate is 30% when the shareholder is a natural person and 20% when the shareholder is a legal entity.

In practice, natural person shareholders may choose to grant non-interest-bearing advances without major adverse consequences. However, this approach is strongly discouraged when the shareholder is a legal entity. In such cases, the absence of interest may be characterized by the tax authorities as an abnormal act of management. The administration may then recharacterize the free advance as a remunerated loan and reintegrate “theoretical” interest—never actually received—into the taxable income of the lending company.

Moreover, the flexibility of the shareholder’s current account does not exempt the parties from strict traceability requirements. It is common for shareholders to finance the company through successive payments, but each contribution must be fully justified as to its origin.

Case law consistently holds that a credit balance in a shareholder’s current account that is not supported by evidence of the real origin of the funds artificially inflates the company’s liabilities and undermines the reliability of its accounts. The consequences may be severe: the tax authorities are entitled to reject the accounting records and to proceed with a reassessment of turnover, considering that the amounts recorded in the shareholder’s current account correspond to concealed income reinjected into the company.

Legal Securing of the Shareholder’s Current Account

Beyond financial and tax considerations, securing a shareholder’s current account also requires solid legal documentation. Too often, company executives rely solely on bank statements or accounting entries to justify the existence of the advance, which significantly weakens the company’s position in the event of a tax audit or legal dispute.

A shareholder’s current account agreement must be formalized in writing and submitted to registration formalities. Although this registration has a tax purpose, it is of fundamental legal importance: it confers a certain date on the agreement and makes it enforceable against third parties.

Conclusion

The shareholder’s current account is an effective and flexible internal financing tool, particularly well-suited to the operational needs of businesses. However, its effectiveness can only be fully secured through rigorous management and strict compliance with legal, tax, and evidentiary requirements.

The implementation of a written, duly signed and registered agreement, strict traceability of funds, and full compliance with applicable tax rules are essential to prevent recharacterization risks and to protect both the company’s and the shareholder’s assets.

Our firm supports companies and their shareholders in the structuring, formalization, and securing of shareholder current accounts, with the objective of optimizing treasury management while ensuring full legal and tax compliance.

31 Jul 2024

In today’s global economic landscape, Morocco stands out as a stable and attractive investment destination in Africa. It offers a strategic location and high-quality infrastructure, supported by proactive policies that make it an appealing choice for foreign investors.

Investing in Morocco: what are the options?

As a foreign individual or legal entity, there are several avenues for investment in Morocco, including:

  • Establishment of a company
  • Making equity investments
  • Contributing to shareholder current accounts
  • Issuing loans
  • Developing Real estate
  • Acquiring financial instruments

What should I consider about foreign exchange regulations when investing in Morocco?

Foreign investments in Morocco must be fully financed in foreign currency through a Moroccan bank. This allows for the repatriation of income and gains from the investment. This system, known as the convertibility regime, provides foreign investors with the flexibility to transfer their revenues and profits back to their home countries.

And what if the investment wasn’t financed in foreign currency?

If your investment isn’t financed in foreign currency, it’s important to know that Moroccan non-residents and foreign residents face restrictions. They cannot transfer their income (such as dividends, rental earnings, loan interest, etc.) or profits from selling investments that do not adhere to the convertibility rules back to their home country.

However, non-resident foreigners can:

  • Transfer their earned income, like dividends or rental earnings, freely, whether they are individuals or companies.
  • Send profits from selling investments in Morocco that do not comply with the convertibility regime abroad. This transfer typically occurs in four equal yearly installments of 25% each, starting when the funds are deposited into a designated bank account for this purpose.

For expert guidance on navigating Moroccan regulatory requirements and optimizing your investment strategy, contact us.

03 Jun 2024

The Moroccan Simplified Joint Stock Company (SAS) is a commercial company by form, with any objective. It is governed by Articles 43-1 to 43-15 of Law 5-96, and certain provisions of Law 17-95 relating to joint-stock companies.

Its main advantage lies in offering shareholders a legal structure where contractual freedom prevails, from drafting bylaws to operating procedures, thereby allowing for true effectiveness in the provisions usually contained in the bylaws.

1) CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SAS

Shareholders:

The simplified joint stock company may be formed by a single shareholder (Single-Member SAS or “SASU”) or multiple shareholders who may be either natural or legal persons, and whose profits or losses are only distributed or borne to the extent of their contributions. However, the bylaws of the SAS may stipulate special benefits for associated or non-associated persons.

Capital Structure:

In principle, the elements related to the SAS capital are framed as follows:

  • Minimum capital amount: Freely determined by the bylaws.
  • Cash contribution: At least one-fourth (1/4) must be paid up at the time of incorporation, with the surplus to be paid within a maximum period of 3 years.
  • Contribution in-kind: Fully paid up at incorporation.
  • Contribution of industry (knowledge, technical skills, and know-how): Possible in exchange for non-transferable shares.

Directors:

The appointment of a single president (shareholder or not), whether natural or legal person, to act on behalf of the SAS is mandatory.

Governance Bodies:

The SAS offers total freedom in setting up the company’s executive, providing several options such as:

  • Opting for a company managed solely by a president, and, if necessary, by one or more general managers.
  • Deciding on a governance structure equivalent to that of a joint-stock company: either the unitary body (board of directors) or dualistic (management board and supervisory board);
  • Or any other structure defined freely in the bylaws.

Auditors:

Their appointment is optional. It only becomes mandatory above a certain threshold set by regulatory provisions.

2) WHY CHOOSE THE SAS?
  • The SAS allows for contractual control over the stability and structure of the shareholding.
  • It ensures the protection of the interests of minority shareholders by assigning powers independently of any reference to the capital held by each shareholder.
  • It provides freedom to the bylaws to organize the exercise of shareholders’ voting rights and the definition of collective decisions, both in form and substance.
3) HOW TO CREATE THE SAS?

Creating the SAS follows the same procedures as other forms of companies before it is registered with the Moroccan Trade Register (Registre du commerce). Here are the steps to create an SAS:

  1. Capital formation,
  2. Establishment of subscription and payment forms in case of cash contribution,
  3. Drafting and signing of the bylaws,
  4. Filing of the incorporation dossier and registration with the Trade Registry, followed by publication of the incorporation notice in the Official Gazette and the Official Bulletin,
  5. Identification with the tax authorities and affiliation with social security organizations.

In conclusion, the simplified joint stock company represents a flexible legal structure suitable for many entrepreneurial projects.

At Mkonsulting, we understand the crucial importance of choosing the right legal form for your business. We are here to guide you through every stage of your company’s establishment, from the initial concept to the finalization of the bylaws. Our experienced team will guide you through the process, ensuring that your needs are fully met and that your business is properly established to thrive.

Feel free to contact us for any requests regarding business creation in Morocco.

Don't miss any crucial regulatory news to optimize your investments and your assets.
Subscribe to our Newsletter and we will keep you informed
Mouna KAMALI
CEO, MKONSULTING